Just the Wax: Medium-focused show doesn't serve medium
very well
By Alex Ebstein for Baltimore City Paper
April 29th, 2009
Wax Actual, the group show of representational, encaustic painters
in the Creative Alliance's upstairs Amalie Rothschild Gallery, has trouble
finding a voice for the medium it seeks to champion. The encaustic medium--basically
pigmented hot wax, which is generally turned to for its seductive ability
to capture light or produce flat or uniquely textured surfaces, as in
the paintings of Canadian artist Tony Scherman--loses its excitement
between the conservative imagery and erratic application. Curated by
Creative Alliance's resident encaustic painter, Christine Sajecki--whose
work far outstrips any artists she includes--and writer Joseph Young,
the exhibition looks self-defeating, presenting the medium, in most
cases, as extraneous.
Of the 10 paintings in the small exhibition, only three demonstrate
an admirable grasp of the medium. Many of the included artists appear
to have picked up the medium (perhaps for its novelty) and run with
it, without stopping to explore it for its unique characteristics. Without
the title tip-off, it would be hard to guess that encaustic is a common
thread throughout the show. In the hexagonal "El Jardinero,"
Margarita Friedman portrays a vibrant portrait of a gardener. While
the painting is technically excellent, and the portrait undeniably charming,
Friedman's medium is questionable. The bold palette and the painterly
application of the medium are so similar to oil that the choice of encaustic
appears superfluous. The luminescence that encaustic can capture in
a surface is lost in the dimples of the brush strokes and the boldness
of the color, rendering the medium unrecognizable. Similarly, the flat,
thin paint application in Randall Steeves' "Ordinary Americans"
might as well be acrylic, with the encaustic effectively disguised.
Seemingly out of place among the colorful canvases and panels, Micah
Cash's abstracted, black-and-white landscapes in Sumi ink and beeswax
again bend the medium in an unsuccessful direction. The hazy gradient
of white sky to black tree line in both pieces would be better served
in watercolor, as the wax is an undetectable element in the images.
Susanne Arnold includes two paintings in the show, "By the Waters
of Babylon: Fire" and "By the Waters of Babylon: Fallout,"
featuring scenes of people working along the shore. Arnold distorts
the encaustic pigment by adding sand to the piece where sand is depicted.
While the technique explores wax's ability to adhere additional materials
to a painting's surface, the effect is similar to using glue, and the
gritty texture is both dull and overworked. Jeff Schaller's "London"
shows a woman in an unnatural, hunched posture with the word "London"
painted horizontally across the canvas. While the overall image is slick,
the paint is applied thinly with no attention given to the medium's
ability to be built up and modeled.
Sandra Sedmak Engel, Pat Dennis, and Rebecca Cason, all Baltimore-based
painters, demonstrate a contrastingly sophisticated craftsmanship, if
slightly more passé imagery. Engel's stylized portrait of a young
woman, entitled "Going to Brighton Beach," is composed and
crafted like pieces of a puzzle. Relatively smooth and pleasingly waxy
on the surface, closer inspection reveals what looks like a careful,
reduction process of grooving the hardened background before adding
additional color to the surface. Her meticulous manipulation of the
wax prevents the colors from mixing, and produces crisp, controlled
line work. Dennis' painting, "Four Horses," is a front view
of four horses in motion. The bodies and faces are slightly relieved
from the surface, the wax applied thickly, allowing it to drip naturally
and spontaneously throughout the image. Cason's small portrait of a
girl, "Katherine," looks like a resin-dipped Renoir postcard.
Using a photo transfer, all the detail work is smoothly encased within
a glossy, top layer of wax looking both polished and synthetic.
The exhibition overall is an insignificant sample of the encaustic
medium. Aesthetically inconsistent and undoubtedly limited by its given
space, the show fails to present a compelling case for the narrow subject
matter on which it focuses. In presenting a show of encaustic work,
a fairly unpopular medium, broadening the subject matter and choosing
the best examples of encaustic painting would have better served the
general curatorial mission.
|